Some People Are Unemployable by Design, Not by Flaw
I once lost a $15,000 project because I refused to build on top of illegal software. That instinct is the same reason I've never been a good employee.
I once got hired to build a website, sat through the vendor's software walkthrough, and figured out inside the meeting that their payment system was illegal. Not sketchy. Illegal. I called the client and told him I couldn't put my name on it.
I lost a $15,000 project that day. It's also the clearest example I have of why I've never been a good employee.
The trait isn't the bug
Every job I've had, I've picked things apart. Asked why, when the answer was supposed to be because I said so. Changed the plan mid-project when the original one stopped being right, even after everyone had signed off. That's exhausting for anyone trying to manage me toward a fixed outcome. It's also the exact reason the illegal-software thing got caught before it became someone else's problem.
Most companies aren't built to want that. They've seen success operating one way, and the instinct is to protect the way, not the outcome. Somebody who questions the way, on principle, reads as a liability. So they hire compliance and call it a culture fit.
Why I actually study this stuff
I take personality frameworks seriously, Myers-Briggs, CliftonStrengths, the whole toolkit, not as a party trick but because understanding how someone is actually wired changes how you position to them, sell to them, write for them, and lead them. A client isn't a demographic. They're a specific configuration of how they take in information, make decisions, and resist being told what to do. I use that lens on myself first because if I can't see my own wiring clearly, I have no business reading anyone else's.
That's also how I know my own unemployability isn't a character flaw. It's a specific, namable configuration, the kind that questions the frame before accepting the instructions inside it. Useful in a founder. Miserable in an employee. Same trait, different context.
What that means if this is you
If you keep getting told you're difficult to manage, that's not automatically a flaw to fix. It's information about the kind of company that can actually use what you do, which is smaller than the kind that will simply tolerate you. You don't need everyone to want that trait in an employee. You need the few who need exactly that trait running loose in their business, unmanaged, on purpose.